Comments on: Back and Forth

By: Clark Haaf

Clark Haaf — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:11:27 +0000

Your website came up in my search and I’m stricken by what you have published on this theme. I am currently diversifying my inquiry and thus cannot contribute further, even so, I’ve bookmarked your internet site and will be returning to keep up with any next updates. Just Now love it and thanks for granting my comment.

By: google says

google says — Sat, 16 May 2009 09:39:48 +0000

It also want to say we’re each developer’s point of view. A path to the world of art and culture so vague and broad. The other represents a desire to find a bridge of more concrete references. The nasionalite and regional identity of South Asia is the earth. We fight for a future together / fragmented future? For my study, I am a guide. So I have to be positive for the future

By: babelfish says

babelfish says — Sat, 16 May 2009 09:38:42 +0000

Ca please also say that one is developing each one his point of view. A way leading to the world of art and the so vague and vast culture. The other way represents desired to find a bridge of refer more concrete. The nasionalite and the regional identity of the South Asia it is the ground. One to fight itself for future a whole of future splits up? For my etudients, I am a guide. Then it is necessary that I am positive for the future.

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 15 May 2009 18:59:22 +0000

Ca veux dire aussi qu’on est en trains de developer chacun son point de vue. Une voie menant a la monde de l’art et la culture tellement vague et vaste. L’autre voie represente une desire de trouver un pont de references plus concrete. La nasionalite et l’identite regional de l’asie du sud c’est la terre. On se combattre pour une future ensemble/ des futures fragmente? Pour mes etudients, je suis un guide. Alors il faut que je soit positive pour l’avenir.

By: saubin

saubin — Fri, 15 May 2009 18:44:11 +0000

what was the tagline then? my memory doesnt really work in this fastpaced networld, too distant to recall.

interesting projection though. in less then 3 months, contempory art has ‘expanded’ to include modern art (no postmodern art?) and from malaysia to southeast asia.

i wonder doesn’t that really confirm the spirit of this regional nusantara culture – ever emcompassing, ever ready to acknowledge the co-existence of differences, instead of purist identification.

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 15 May 2009 18:30:22 +0000

Process bifurbikisasi pandangan kepada dua kemah akan membawah lebih defi-nasi kepada ide-ide yang bermakna kepada kita semua yang berkelompok di peti laman ini.

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 15 May 2009 17:30:02 +0000

its almost saying that there’s two opposing camps of thought forming in arteri.

excellent!

By: admin

admin — Fri, 15 May 2009 15:49:00 +0000

Hi Daniel,

I think I changed it sometime last week given that there are some projects that are in store for the future are more archival in nature. Since it’s not going to be just about contemporary art, but also modern art in malaysia and southeast asia, i changed it lor. u don’t like it?

-simon

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 15 May 2009 13:09:49 +0000

Since when did ARTERI’s tag line changed to Art + Culture I Malaysia + Southeast Asia?

It was different before right?

By: Zedeck

Zedeck — Fri, 15 May 2009 11:22:05 +0000

Hey Simon:

Ah, okay. So what you are saying is that this Five Arts legacy / hegemony is a device that’s being propagated among / by observers and criticism, then?

If so I would agree; it’s us, damn writers, that have to dismantle this old-fashioned construct, for ourselves. “Refusal to engage with the past is no lost (loss?) at all” is something that artists today, to my experience, already say.

As for Piya vs Lost Gen — well, Piya’s not saying that any more, is he? That sums up the currency of that sentiment, to me. The critics that have inherited his legacy need to catch on …