<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lost and Found: Setting up Arteri&#8217;s Suitcase of Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/</link>
	<description>Interactions with Art, Life &#38; Culture &#124; Pasrah mesra memblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:31:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fei</title>
		<link>http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/#comment-10463</link>
		<dc:creator>fei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arterimalaysia.com/?p=5353#comment-10463</guid>
		<description>im serious
 and 
im honest too.
but 
i
dont 
judging art 
in morality way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im serious<br />
 and<br />
im honest too.<br />
but<br />
i<br />
dont<br />
judging art<br />
in morality way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamilah</title>
		<link>http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/#comment-10396</link>
		<dc:creator>jamilah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arterimalaysia.com/?p=5353#comment-10396</guid>
		<description>^________^ @chitoo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^________^ @chitoo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdullah</title>
		<link>http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/#comment-10291</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdullah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arterimalaysia.com/?p=5353#comment-10291</guid>
		<description>I am pretty sure Picasso, Warhol, amongst many others all thought themselves to be geniuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pretty sure Picasso, Warhol, amongst many others all thought themselves to be geniuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SANG KHECIL</title>
		<link>http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/#comment-10286</link>
		<dc:creator>SANG KHECIL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arterimalaysia.com/?p=5353#comment-10286</guid>
		<description>I CERTAINLY AGREE WITH THE COMMENTS WHICH WERE EXPRESSED BY goatse, ESPECIALLY &quot;...can artist be a bit more honest with the actual standards of their achievements&quot;. 
PENGIAT SENI MUDA MASAKINI KALIHATAN ALWAYS HAD A TENDENCY TOWARDS FRIVOLITY, ALSO LACKING OF (A BIT MORE)HONEST TERHADAP THEIR ART PRACTISE BAHPUN MEREKA SENDIRI!
C&quot;MON, DID ANY MASTERS OF ART CLAIM THEMSELVE AS &quot;THE GENIUS&quot;? KELAKAR BETUL :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I CERTAINLY AGREE WITH THE COMMENTS WHICH WERE EXPRESSED BY goatse, ESPECIALLY &#8220;&#8230;can artist be a bit more honest with the actual standards of their achievements&#8221;.<br />
PENGIAT SENI MUDA MASAKINI KALIHATAN ALWAYS HAD A TENDENCY TOWARDS FRIVOLITY, ALSO LACKING OF (A BIT MORE)HONEST TERHADAP THEIR ART PRACTISE BAHPUN MEREKA SENDIRI!<br />
C&#8221;MON, DID ANY MASTERS OF ART CLAIM THEMSELVE AS &#8220;THE GENIUS&#8221;? KELAKAR BETUL :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohd K</title>
		<link>http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/#comment-10281</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohd K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arterimalaysia.com/?p=5353#comment-10281</guid>
		<description>I love Fei&#039;s suitcase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Fei&#8217;s suitcase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goatse</title>
		<link>http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/#comment-10280</link>
		<dc:creator>goatse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arterimalaysia.com/?p=5353#comment-10280</guid>
		<description>On one hand, I&#039;d agree with Sharon that  definitions of &#039;suitcase&#039; and &#039;stuff&#039; needs to be flexible to accomodate the lateral thinking artist types have. 

But for Fey to so proudly say that his suitcase is &#039;one of his magnum opus&#039; really exagerates words to the limits far beyond goatse (warning! do not google image search &#039;goatse&#039; without safety filters on if you&#039;r a virgin with fantasies of mating with a unicorn). 

Am I not getting his sarcasm, joke, or wut?

Almost nothing is sacred anymore in this day and age but lets keep the sanctity of certain words and phrases if we really are to seriously say that we here are indeed art freaks. 

For me, a &#039;magnum opus&#039; is something rarely achieved by any artist in their lifetime. They may produce many works which are considered as &#039;masterpiece&#039; but here we have Fey declairing that his suitcase is but &#039;one&#039; of his magnum opus?

If it were truely so, Arteri would surely have a special article or atleast a photo here highlighting his work eh? Instead, we have a page for a ho hum painting of a swimming man, teh expo thief, children... Is Fey so totally avant-garede that all the art experts and general public have missunderstood the genius of his work? 

The genius of a magnum opus is something which is recognized by many and doubted by very, very few. Such rare works are able to spand ages and cultures, inspire others and give birth to new creations, styles, or movements.

Fey, until you reach that point, I would suggest you retract or defend your statement. If the work is indeed a strong work, you shall have to do anything yourself as other art lovers will circle around you and defend your work till the internet freezes over....

Meh nevermind, Fey can&#039;t be serious but can artist be a bit more honest with the actual standards of their achievements? It&#039;s a cute joke to say that a magnum opus is in a suitcase but when even piles of badly assembled scrap takes you to Petronas these days, it&#039;s a sign of a rot happening in the heart of culture. 

Which ever way or path our creatives decides on, they must be more desiring of excellence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On one hand, I&#8217;d agree with Sharon that  definitions of &#8217;suitcase&#8217; and &#8217;stuff&#8217; needs to be flexible to accomodate the lateral thinking artist types have. </p>
<p>But for Fey to so proudly say that his suitcase is &#8216;one of his magnum opus&#8217; really exagerates words to the limits far beyond goatse (warning! do not google image search &#8216;goatse&#8217; without safety filters on if you&#8217;r a virgin with fantasies of mating with a unicorn). </p>
<p>Am I not getting his sarcasm, joke, or wut?</p>
<p>Almost nothing is sacred anymore in this day and age but lets keep the sanctity of certain words and phrases if we really are to seriously say that we here are indeed art freaks. </p>
<p>For me, a &#8216;magnum opus&#8217; is something rarely achieved by any artist in their lifetime. They may produce many works which are considered as &#8216;masterpiece&#8217; but here we have Fey declairing that his suitcase is but &#8216;one&#8217; of his magnum opus?</p>
<p>If it were truely so, Arteri would surely have a special article or atleast a photo here highlighting his work eh? Instead, we have a page for a ho hum painting of a swimming man, teh expo thief, children&#8230; Is Fey so totally avant-garede that all the art experts and general public have missunderstood the genius of his work? </p>
<p>The genius of a magnum opus is something which is recognized by many and doubted by very, very few. Such rare works are able to spand ages and cultures, inspire others and give birth to new creations, styles, or movements.</p>
<p>Fey, until you reach that point, I would suggest you retract or defend your statement. If the work is indeed a strong work, you shall have to do anything yourself as other art lovers will circle around you and defend your work till the internet freezes over&#8230;.</p>
<p>Meh nevermind, Fey can&#8217;t be serious but can artist be a bit more honest with the actual standards of their achievements? It&#8217;s a cute joke to say that a magnum opus is in a suitcase but when even piles of badly assembled scrap takes you to Petronas these days, it&#8217;s a sign of a rot happening in the heart of culture. </p>
<p>Which ever way or path our creatives decides on, they must be more desiring of excellence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chi too</title>
		<link>http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/#comment-10246</link>
		<dc:creator>chi too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arterimalaysia.com/?p=5353#comment-10246</guid>
		<description>yes, i have to say that fei&#039;s suitcase is truly his magnum opus, some might even go as far as to say that it is his magnum octopus.

i personally think that the act of opening my suitcase is also fei&#039;s magnum opus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, i have to say that fei&#8217;s suitcase is truly his magnum opus, some might even go as far as to say that it is his magnum octopus.</p>
<p>i personally think that the act of opening my suitcase is also fei&#8217;s magnum opus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fei</title>
		<link>http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/#comment-10234</link>
		<dc:creator>fei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arterimalaysia.com/?p=5353#comment-10234</guid>
		<description>as an artist participated in the show,i would not shame to say the case that i submitted was one of my magnum opus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as an artist participated in the show,i would not shame to say the case that i submitted was one of my magnum opus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 长璜</title>
		<link>http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/#comment-10229</link>
		<dc:creator>长璜</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arterimalaysia.com/?p=5353#comment-10229</guid>
		<description>忘了说，trans-l8tr的汉英翻译功夫非常了得，尤其是巧妙地采用了thing和stuff两个不同的英文单字来翻“东西”这个在中文里特有意思的词，赞！谨此谢过。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>忘了说，trans-l8tr的汉英翻译功夫非常了得，尤其是巧妙地采用了thing和stuff两个不同的英文单字来翻“东西”这个在中文里特有意思的词，赞！谨此谢过。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 长璜</title>
		<link>http://www.arterimalaysia.com/2009/11/21/lost-and-found-setting-up-arteris-suitcase-of-stuff/#comment-10228</link>
		<dc:creator>长璜</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arterimalaysia.com/?p=5353#comment-10228</guid>
		<description>谢谢Arteri团队和其他Arteri粉丝的回应。
这样说好了，我个人其实只是对本届Art Expo那几个“展中展”比较感兴趣，其中肯定包括“Suitcase of Stuff”了；反正我又不是艺术收藏家。
作为一名旁观者，我岂敢越过自己的“位置”去要求策展人对其所策划的展览内容（如Suitcase和Stuff）设定一个知识论意义上的“规范”！
况且，只要是稍微有经验的艺术观众，哪里会看不出Arteri展区所展出的都是一些倾向“实验性的”，“游戏性的”，“无目的性的”甚至是连命名也略有困难的“创作形式”——有参加者还结合了艺术表演的形式呢！——所以，如果有人会感到“晕头转向”根本就不奇怪了。
艺术世界有艺术自己一套的语言系统，习惯了这套语言系统的人，即使在所谓的“艺术空间”里头看到一堆“破烂”或者“大便”当然不觉得有什么问题，那毕竟是符合某种“规范”下的“艺术”嘛！
问题是：普罗大众是不是必须按照这套语言系统来自我调节，以便接受上述的“破烂”或者“大便”为艺术呢？换句话说，艺术工作者口口声声的“开放性”又是什么？开个玩笑说，难道艺术的“开放性”就是要够“狂欢”够“粗野”够“爆炸性”够“不怕死”吗？（一笑）
再请Arteri团队不吝赐教。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>谢谢Arteri团队和其他Arteri粉丝的回应。<br />
这样说好了，我个人其实只是对本届Art Expo那几个“展中展”比较感兴趣，其中肯定包括“Suitcase of Stuff”了；反正我又不是艺术收藏家。<br />
作为一名旁观者，我岂敢越过自己的“位置”去要求策展人对其所策划的展览内容（如Suitcase和Stuff）设定一个知识论意义上的“规范”！<br />
况且，只要是稍微有经验的艺术观众，哪里会看不出Arteri展区所展出的都是一些倾向“实验性的”，“游戏性的”，“无目的性的”甚至是连命名也略有困难的“创作形式”——有参加者还结合了艺术表演的形式呢！——所以，如果有人会感到“晕头转向”根本就不奇怪了。<br />
艺术世界有艺术自己一套的语言系统，习惯了这套语言系统的人，即使在所谓的“艺术空间”里头看到一堆“破烂”或者“大便”当然不觉得有什么问题，那毕竟是符合某种“规范”下的“艺术”嘛！<br />
问题是：普罗大众是不是必须按照这套语言系统来自我调节，以便接受上述的“破烂”或者“大便”为艺术呢？换句话说，艺术工作者口口声声的“开放性”又是什么？开个玩笑说，难道艺术的“开放性”就是要够“狂欢”够“粗野”够“爆炸性”够“不怕死”吗？（一笑）<br />
再请Arteri团队不吝赐教。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
